Skip to content

Conversation

@Ignas
Copy link

@Ignas Ignas commented Nov 26, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Extended Docker image build support to include ARM64 architecture in addition to x86-64, enabling Docker images to run on additional processor architectures.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 26, 2025

Walkthrough

Updated the GitHub Actions build workflow to compile Docker images for multiple architectures (linux/amd64 and linux/arm64/v8) instead of a single architecture during non-main branch builds, enabling broader platform support.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Docker Build Platform Configuration
\.github/workflows/build.yaml``
Updated Docker build platform list from single platform (linux/amd64) to multi-arch support (linux/amd64,linux/arm64/v8) in the Build and Push step for non-main branches

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes

  • Single configuration file modified with straightforward parameter change
  • No complex logic or conditional flow alterations
  • Verify platform list syntax and intended deployment targets

Poem

🐰 A rabbit hops across the build—
From one arch to many more,
AMD64, ARM64 in a twirl,
Now images dance on every shore!

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and specifically summarizes the main change: enabling ARM builds for Docker images to support Mac development, which directly matches the file change from single platform to multi-arch (linux/amd64,linux/arm64/v8).
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch bring-back-arm

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/build.yaml (1)

76-92: Verify that always building arm64 on feature branches aligns with team expectations.

The change correctly enables multi-architecture builds with proper QEMU and Buildx setup. However, building for both linux/amd64 and linux/arm64/v8 on every commit—including to feature branches—will significantly increase CI build times due to QEMU-based cross-compilation overhead. The arm64 images aren't pushed on non-main branches (line 91), so the additional build cost provides no immediate benefit outside of main.

Consider making arm64 builds conditional to optimize CI efficiency:

- platforms: linux/amd64,linux/arm64/v8
+ platforms: ${{ github.ref_name == 'main' && 'linux/amd64,linux/arm64/v8' || 'linux/amd64' }}

This reserves multi-arch builds for main branch, where images are actually pushed, while keeping feature branch builds fast for rapid iteration.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9db57bb and 10d1166.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/build.yaml (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: Build Image (pg17)
  • GitHub Check: Build Image (pg15)
  • GitHub Check: Build Image (pg16)

@Ignas Ignas merged commit 8c24fc0 into main Nov 26, 2025
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants