optimalAmountIn for two xy=k AMMs/pools #3
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Owner
|
@amalnathsathyan can you update the notes in the readme + add yourself as contributor |
Author
|
Sure. I'll update. |
Author
|
@dhruvsol updated readme. Next, will work on the optimalAmountIn for DLMM pools, so that this can be applied on intra-pool arbitrage in meteora. |
Author
|
@dhruvsol you may close and merge this PR. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For a successful arbitrage between two pools following the equation xy = k, factors such as slippage, reserves, and amountIn must be take into account. Arbitrary inputs will not yield the expected results when the reserves and fee parameters differ between the two pools. Here is how you can derive an optimalAmountIn for that. Same approach can be extended to any AMMs, not only classical xy=k ones.