Skip to content

[VDO-6059] Fix CI for 8.3 branch#419

Merged
bjohnsto merged 2 commits intodm-vdo:8.3from
bjohnsto:branch/8.3
Mar 3, 2026
Merged

[VDO-6059] Fix CI for 8.3 branch#419
bjohnsto merged 2 commits intodm-vdo:8.3from
bjohnsto:branch/8.3

Conversation

@bjohnsto
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@bjohnsto bjohnsto commented Feb 3, 2026

Update the the test Makefiles to run 8.3 branch on RHEL10 machines.

This PR needs to wait on #430 to be done first as it requires an 8.3 CI file to exist on the main branch.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 3, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

  • 🔍 Trigger a full review
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Important

Action Needed: IP Allowlist Update

If your organization protects your Git platform with IP whitelisting, please add the new CodeRabbit IP address to your allowlist:

  • 136.113.208.247/32 (new)
  • 34.170.211.100/32
  • 35.222.179.152/32

Reviews will stop working after February 8, 2026 if the new IP is not added to your allowlist.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@lorelei-sakai lorelei-sakai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The contents seem reasonable.

But, if this is fixing CI testing on the 8.3 branch... shouldn't the CI testing pass?
(The test failures look as though the STATIC label is not being defined in these builds, somehow.)

@bjohnsto bjohnsto changed the title [VDO-6024] Fix CI for 8.3 branch [VDO-6059] Fix CI for 8.3 branch Feb 26, 2026
lorelei-sakai
lorelei-sakai previously approved these changes Feb 26, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@lorelei-sakai lorelei-sakai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Contingent on CI passing after the changes to main are in, this looks good.

C2Redhat and others added 2 commits February 27, 2026 12:06
ScriptFramework.pm causes an error in F41 with the following warning:
Name "main::log" used only once: possible typo at ./ScriptFramework.pm line 169.

Turn off used only once warning.

Signed-off-by: Chung Chung <cchung@redhat.com>
Update branch Makefiles to run 8.3 branch testing by default on
RHEL10 machines.

Due to the nature of pull_request_target, CI changes for this branch
must be made on the main branch. There is a separate PR for that
work. Specific branch changes only require the test and test suite
changes.

Signed-off-by: Bruce Johnston <bjohnsto@redhat.com>
@bjohnsto
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

bjohnsto commented Mar 2, 2026

The contents seem reasonable.

But, if this is fixing CI testing on the 8.3 branch... shouldn't the CI testing pass? (The test failures look as though the STATIC label is not being defined in these builds, somehow.)

I've updated the PR.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@lorelei-sakai lorelei-sakai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I might have liked a bit more documentation on what you've done here.
For instance, the 'use once' fix appears to be cherry-picked from somewhere else, which is fine, but it would be good for this PR to cite where it came from.

But the content looks basically correct and it's now passing CI, so this is good.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants