fix: filter non-members from thread followers #1
+55
−22
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Filter followers and mentionIds to only include room members before adding to thread replies. Prevents non-members from appearing as thread followers in private channels.
Owner
Author
|
@copilot any suggestions for the PR |
dodaa08
force-pushed
the
fix/NonMembers-InFollowers
branch
from
1cba261 to
fe2dfca
Compare
dodaa08
force-pushed
the
fix/NonMembers-InFollowers
branch
from
2be25bb to
a23e408
Compare
dodaa08
force-pushed
the
fix/NonMembers-InFollowers
branch
from
0bba4f9 to
8fa5df6
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Filter followers and mentionIds to only include room members before adding to thread replies. Prevents non-members from appearing as thread followers in private channels.
Proposed changes (including videos or screenshots)
Issue(s)
Steps to test or reproduce
Further comments