Rename condition WITH_RIOT_GNRC to WITH_RIOT_SOCK#128
Merged
obgm merged 1 commit intoeclipse-tinydtls:developfrom May 23, 2022
Merged
Rename condition WITH_RIOT_GNRC to WITH_RIOT_SOCK#128obgm merged 1 commit intoeclipse-tinydtls:developfrom
obgm merged 1 commit intoeclipse-tinydtls:developfrom
Conversation
Using tinydtls on RIOT OS is not limited to GNRC as network stack. It is also working with e.g. lwIP, see: RIOT-OS/RIOT#17552 Therefore the name WITH_RIOT_GNRC is misleading.
This was referenced Mar 26, 2022
Contributor
|
Thanks! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Using tinydtls on RIOT OS is not limited to GNRC as network stack. It is also working with e.g. lwIP, see: RIOT-OS/RIOT#17552. Therefore the name WITH_RIOT_GNRC is misleading.
PR in RIOT OS has already been approved and was merged: