Skip to content

Conversation

mjwolf
Copy link
Contributor

@mjwolf mjwolf commented Oct 1, 2025

1. What does this PR do?

Change the multi_field field type in the entity schema to match_only_text.

2. Which ECS fields are affected/introduced?

entity.name and entity.display_name, and the other fieldsets where entity is re-used are affected.

3. Why is this change necessary?

match_only_text is the dynamic mapping type that matches these fields, and is what is used for other similar fields, so changing the type will make this consistent with others.

4. Have you added/updated documentation?

YES

5. Have you built ECS and committed any newly generated files?

YES

6. Have you run the ECS validation tests locally?

YES

7. Anything else for the reviewers?


Commit Message

Change the field type for multi_field values in entity from text to match_only_text.

This change will match the multi_field type used for other similar fields in other schema files, and will match the expected dynamic value in ecs@mappings.

Change the field type for multi_field values in entity from text to
match_only_text.

This change will match the multi_field type used for other similar fields in
other schema files, and will match the expected dynamic value in ecs@mappings.
@mjwolf mjwolf requested a review from a team as a code owner October 1, 2025 20:07
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 1, 2025

Documentation changes preview: https://docs-v3-preview.elastic.dev/elastic/ecs/pull/2547/reference/

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 1, 2025

🤖 GitHub comments

Expand to view the GitHub comments

Just comment with:

  • run docs-build : Re-trigger the docs validation. (use unformatted text in the comment!)

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 1, 2025

🔍 Preview links for changed docs

Copy link

@flash1293 flash1293 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants