Skip to content

Conversation

@sorawee
Copy link
Collaborator

@sorawee sorawee commented Mar 5, 2024

On commands like raco distribute, paths under define-runtime-path will be copied over for distribution, which mandates their existence. Therefore, we should only use define-runtime-path with paths that we know for sure that they exist.

On commands like `raco distribute`, paths under `define-runtime-path`
will be copied over for distribution, which mandates their existence.
Therefore, we should only use `define-runtime-path` with paths
that we know for sure that they exist.
@gussmith23
Copy link
Contributor

FWIW, putting the solver binaries into Rosette did turn out to be the cleanest way to package up my project. It eliminated the need for extra logic telling Rosette where the packaged solvers are. I wouldn't have discovered this feature without Rosette forcing the binaries to be present. I do think that making the binaries optional is definitely the right idea, though perhaps there should be some specific documentation on packaging up projects that use Rosette, specifically suggesting that copying the binaries into Rosette is an easy route to packaging up the binaries.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants