Skip to content

change(freetype): exclude cve-2026-23865#698

Merged
mahavirj merged 1 commit intoespressif:masterfrom
Ashish285:change/exclude_cve-2026-23865
Mar 5, 2026
Merged

change(freetype): exclude cve-2026-23865#698
mahavirj merged 1 commit intoespressif:masterfrom
Ashish285:change/exclude_cve-2026-23865

Conversation

@Ashish285
Copy link
Collaborator

@Ashish285 Ashish285 commented Mar 5, 2026

Change description

freetype was recently update to v2.14.2 with this PR, however even after the update, esp-idf-sbom still mentions CVE-2026-23865 (The CVE description mentions Freetype).

This PR adds CVE-2026-23865 to the exclude list as it is fixed in the current version.

@Ashish285 Ashish285 requested review from fhrbata and mahavirj March 5, 2026 03:30
Copy link
Collaborator

@fhrbata fhrbata left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The reason it's still reported is that the CVE has not yet been processed in NVD and it does not have a CPE assigned. The extended scan looks for keywords, like FreeType, in the description, and that the reason it's still reported. Adding the CVE into the exclude list is the proper way how to handle this situation, until CPE is assigned to CVE by NVD. Thank you

@Ashish285
Copy link
Collaborator Author

The reason it's still reported is that the CVE has not yet been processed in NVD and it does not have a CPE assigned. The extended scan looks for keywords, like FreeType, in the description, and that the reason it's still reported. Adding the CVE into the exclude list is the proper way how to handle this situation, until CPE is assigned to CVE by NVD. Thank you

Ok, thanks for letting me know. Updated the description. Thanks!

@mahavirj mahavirj merged commit 300d5f9 into espressif:master Mar 5, 2026
85 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants