Skip to content

Add project agent scaffold from provided architecture diagram#1

Merged
fissafissaintoki merged 1 commit intomainfrom
codex/review-pr-points-for-security-and-quality
Mar 13, 2026
Merged

Add project agent scaffold from provided architecture diagram#1
fissafissaintoki merged 1 commit intomainfrom
codex/review-pr-points-for-security-and-quality

Conversation

@fissafissaintoki
Copy link
Owner

Summary

  • Added a complete multi-agent scaffold matching the provided architecture flow.
  • Introduced agents/registry.yml as a central definition of agents, roles, inputs/outputs, providers/channels, and handoff routing.
  • Added per-agent prompt templates in agents/prompts/ for:
    • market_data_feed
    • news_scraper
    • sentiment_analyzer
    • core_engine
    • pattern_matcher
    • signal_generator
    • live_dashboard
    • watchlists
    • news_block
    • alert_layer
  • Added agents/README.md as the starting point for implementation.
  • Updated top-level README.md to reference the new agent scaffold.

Notes

  • This change provides structure and prompt contracts, not runtime worker/service implementation yet.

Codex Task

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: dc16addce9

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Du bist der Core-Engine-Agent.
- Führe Market, News und Sentiment je Ticker/Zeitscheibe zusammen.
- Berechne konsistente Features inkl. Datenqualität.
- Ausgabeformat: `fused_feature_frame` pro Ticker.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Match core-engine output key to registry contract

The prompt asks Core Engine to output fused_feature_frame (agents/prompts/core_engine.md), but the registry contract routes fused_feature_frames from core_engine to pattern_matcher (agents/registry.yml, outputs/inputs at lines 55 and 63). If a worker follows the prompt literally, the handoff key will not match the orchestrator contract and downstream pattern matching can receive no data.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.


Du bist der Pattern-Matcher-Agent (Oktagon-Logik).
- Erkenne Muster und Gegenmuster aus `fused_feature_frame`.
- Gib je Ereignis aus: `pattern_id`, `ticker`, `strength`, `direction`, `explanation`.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Emit anti_pattern_events in pattern matcher prompt

The registry defines two required outputs from pattern_matcherpattern_events and anti_pattern_events—and signal_generator depends on both (agents/registry.yml, lines 64-66 and 74-75), but the prompt only specifies a generic per-event payload and never names an anti_pattern_events output channel. In a schema-driven implementation this ambiguity can drop anti-pattern data and break or degrade downstream signal generation.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

# Signal Generator Agent Prompt

Du bist der Signal-Generator-Agent.
- Erzeuge aus Pattern-Events handelbare Signale.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Include anti-pattern input in signal generation prompt

The signal generator contract consumes both pattern_events and anti_pattern_events (agents/registry.yml, lines 74-75), but the prompt instructs generation only from “Pattern-Events.” When implementers or LLM workers follow this prompt, contraindicating anti-patterns can be ignored, which undermines the risk-balancing logic encoded in the architecture.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@fissafissaintoki fissafissaintoki merged commit d9ab2ce into main Mar 13, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant