Add snappy decompression

[Schamper]

Closes #96

Also further cleanup of some of the compression unit and benchmark tests.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 53 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 0.00%. Comparing base (2a4d60a) to head (2b1bcf4).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
dissect/util/compression/snappy.py	0.00%	53 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main    #109   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   0.00%   0.00%           
=====================================
  Files         27      28    +1     
  Lines       1967    2020   +53     
=====================================
- Misses      1967    2020   +53     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 12 untouched benchmarks
🆕 21 new benchmarks
⏩ 16 skipped benchmarks¹

Performance Changes

	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
🆕	test_benchmark_lz4_decompress[python-basic]	N/A	65.2 µs	N/A
🆕	test_benchmark_lzbitmap_decompress[large]	N/A	12.9 ms	N/A
🆕	test_benchmark_lzbitmap_decompress[uncompressed]	N/A	39.2 µs	N/A
🆕	test_benchmark_snappy_decompress[basic]	N/A	63.7 µs	N/A
🆕	test_benchmark_lzxpress_huffman_decompress[large]	N/A	5.9 ms	N/A
🆕	test_benchmark_lzfse_decompress[large]	N/A	5.9 ms	N/A
🆕	test_benchmark_lzbitmap_decompress[small]	N/A	202.5 µs	N/A
🆕	test_benchmark_lz4_decompress[python-large]	N/A	170 µs	N/A
🆕	test_benchmark_lzxpress_decompress[basic]	N/A	143.5 µs	N/A
🆕	test_benchmark_snappy_decompress[large]	N/A	815.3 µs	N/A
🆕	test_benchmark_lzo_decompress[python-larger]	N/A	3.1 ms	N/A
🆕	test_benchmark_lzo_decompress[python-large]	N/A	588.6 µs	N/A
🆕	test_benchmark_lzo_decompress[python-header]	N/A	38.7 µs	N/A
🆕	test_benchmark_lzo_decompress[python-basic]	N/A	97.6 µs	N/A
🆕	test_benchmark_lzfse_decompress[basic]	N/A	199.4 µs	N/A
🆕	test_benchmark_lznt1_decompress[large]	N/A	3.8 ms	N/A
🆕	test_benchmark_lznt1_decompress[basic]	N/A	104.2 µs	N/A
🆕	test_benchmark_lzvn_decompress[large]	N/A	1.3 ms	N/A
🆕	test_benchmark_lzxpress_huffman_decompress[basic]	N/A	2.6 ms	N/A
🆕	test_benchmark_lzxpress_decompress[large]	N/A	540.2 µs	N/A
...	...	...	...	...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

---

_{Comparing snappy (2b1bcf4) with main (2a4d60a)}

Footnotes

1. 16 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩