Update main.go #1
Conversation
Added prime number function.
|
Thank you for providing the summary of changes. I will review the code hunks and provide suggestions to improve the code quality.
public class Project {
private int projectCode;
private String projectName;
public int getProjectCode() {
return projectCode;
}
public void setProjectCode(int projectCode) {
this.projectCode = projectCode;
}
public String getProjectName() {
return projectName;
}
public void setProjectName(String projectName) {
this.projectName = projectName;
}
}The
Here's the updated public class Project {
private int projectCode;
private String projectName;
public Project(int projectCode, String projectName) {
this.projectCode = projectCode;
this.projectName = projectName;
}
public int getProjectCode() {
return projectCode;
}
public void setProjectCode(int projectCode) {
this.projectCode = projectCode;
}
public String getProjectName() {
return projectName;
}
public void setProjectName(String projectName) {
this.projectName = projectName;
}
@Override
public String toString() {
return "Project{" +
"projectCode=" + projectCode +
", projectName='" + projectName + '\'' +
'}';
}
}
package main
import (
"fmt"
"math/rand"
"time"
)
func main() {
rand.Seed(time.Now().UnixNano())
randomNumber := rand.Intn(100)
fmt.Println(randomNumber)
}The Go program generates and prints a random number between 0 and 99. The code is simple and straightforward, but there are a few improvements that can be made:
Here's the updated package main
import (
"fmt"
"math/rand"
"time"
)
const maxRandomNumber = 100
func generateRandomNumber(max int) int {
rand.Seed(time.Now().UnixNano())
return rand.Intn(max)
}
func main() {
randomNumber := generateRandomNumber(maxRandomNumber)
fmt.Println(randomNumber)
}These changes improve the maintainability and modularity of the code. Chat with
|
|
Thank you for providing the summary of changes. I will review the Please provide the code snippet for the Chat with
|
![coderabbit-nyctonid[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/46122307?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| func printPrimeNumbers(num1, num2 int){ | ||
| if num1<2 || num2<2{ | ||
| fmt.Println("Numbers must be greater than 2 for this to work.") | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
| for num1 <= num2 { | ||
| isPrime := true | ||
| for i:=2; i<=int(math.Sqrt(float64(num1))); i++{ | ||
| if num1 % i == 0{ | ||
| isPrime = false | ||
| break | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| if isPrime { | ||
| fmt.Printf("Found Prime number: %d ", num1) | ||
| } | ||
| num1++ | ||
| } | ||
| fmt.Println() | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The printPrimeNumbers function can be optimized by creating a separate function to check if a number is prime. This will make the code more modular and easier to maintain.
| func printPrimeNumbers(num1, num2 int){ | |
| if num1<2 || num2<2{ | |
| fmt.Println("Numbers must be greater than 2 for this to work.") | |
| return | |
| } | |
| for num1 <= num2 { | |
| isPrime := true | |
| for i:=2; i<=int(math.Sqrt(float64(num1))); i++{ | |
| if num1 % i == 0{ | |
| isPrime = false | |
| break | |
| } | |
| } | |
| if isPrime { | |
| fmt.Printf("Found Prime number: %d ", num1) | |
| } | |
| num1++ | |
| } | |
| fmt.Println() | |
| } | |
| func printPrimeNumbers(num1, num2 int) { | |
| if num1 < 2 || num2 < 2 { | |
| fmt.Println("Numbers must be greater than 2 for this to work.") | |
| return | |
| } | |
| for num1 <= num2 { | |
| if isPrime(num1) { | |
| fmt.Printf("Found Prime number: %d ", num1) | |
| } | |
| num1++ | |
| } | |
| fmt.Println() | |
| } | |
| func isPrime(n int) bool { | |
| if n <= 1 { | |
| return false | |
| } | |
| for i := 2; i <= int(math.Sqrt(float64(n))); i++ { | |
| if n % i == 0 { | |
| return false | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return true | |
| } |
Added prime number function.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Thank you for providing the summary of changes. I will now review the
printPrimeNumbersfunction based on the description provided.Please provide the code snippet of the
printPrimeNumbersfunction so that I can analyze it and suggest improvements if necessary.