Skip to content

feat!: establish mapping boundary between inline and document [DISCUSSION]#313

Open
jpower432 wants to merge 1 commit intogemaraproj:mainfrom
jpower432:mapping-artifact
Open

feat!: establish mapping boundary between inline and document [DISCUSSION]#313
jpower432 wants to merge 1 commit intogemaraproj:mainfrom
jpower432:mapping-artifact

Conversation

@jpower432
Copy link
Contributor

@jpower432 jpower432 commented Feb 28, 2026

Description

Adds initial mapping PR for discussion

Schema Changes

Schema Changes Made

  • No schema changes
  • Layer 1 schema (layer-1.cue) changes
  • Layer 2 schema (layer-2.cue) changes
  • Layer 3 schema (layer-3.cue) changes
  • Layer 5 schema (layer-5.cue) changes

Schema Change Details

<!-- If applicable, provide a brief summary or example of schema changes -->

Testing

  • Unit tests added/updated
  • Manual testing performed
  • Test data updated (if applicable)

Related Issues

Closes #304
Closes #86 (?)
Blocked by #312
Continues discussion of #306

Reviewer Hints

Self-review checklist

  • This PR has content that was created with AI assistance.
  • I have the experience and knowledge necessary to answer maintainer questions about the content of this PR, without using AI.

See docs/adrs/0014-mapping-boundaries.md

Assisted by: Cursor
Signed-off-by: Jennifer Power <barnabei.jennifer@gmail.com>
@jpower432 jpower432 marked this pull request as ready for review March 3, 2026 01:20
@jpower432 jpower432 requested a review from a team as a code owner March 3, 2026 01:20
@jpower432
Copy link
Contributor Author

@eddie-knight I am wondering if we need to review whether these mapping structures can support - ossf/scorecard#4952 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Proposal] Explore support for different types of mappings Increase fidelity of mapping relationships

1 participant