fix(docs): Remove hard-coded domains from URLs where applicable across all documentation

[jas-kas]

No description provided.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
develop-docs	Ready	Preview	Comment	Aug 29, 2025 6:51pm
sentry-docs	Ready	Preview	Comment	Aug 29, 2025 6:51pm

[codecov]

Bundle Report

Changes will increase total bundle size by 25.03kB (0.11%) ⬆️. This is within the configured threshold ✅

Detailed changes

Bundle name	Size	Change
sentry-docs-client-array-push	9.9MB	-6 bytes (-0.0%) ⬇️
sentry-docs-server-cjs	12.55MB	25.04kB (0.2%) ⬆️

Affected Assets, Files, and Routes:

view changes for bundle: sentry-docs-client-array-push

Assets Changed:

Asset Name	Size Change	Total Size	Change (%)
static/chunks/pages/_app-*.js	-3 bytes	882.71kB	-0.0%
static/chunks/8321-*.js	-3 bytes	425.87kB	-0.0%
static/WXAKV9cAVunHOSjfsp3n9/_buildManifest.js (New)	684 bytes	684 bytes	100.0% 🚀
static/WXAKV9cAVunHOSjfsp3n9/_ssgManifest.js (New)	77 bytes	77 bytes	100.0% 🚀
static/b5VIv0qKYSo4hNALiATv7/_buildManifest.js (Deleted)	-684 bytes	0 bytes	-100.0% 🗑️
static/b5VIv0qKYSo4hNALiATv7/_ssgManifest.js (Deleted)	-77 bytes	0 bytes	-100.0% 🗑️

view changes for bundle: sentry-docs-server-cjs

Assets Changed:

Asset Name	Size Change	Total Size	Change (%)
1729.js	-3 bytes	1.78MB	-0.0%
../instrumentation.js	-3 bytes	1.1MB	-0.0%
9523.js	-3 bytes	1.08MB	-0.0%
../app/[[...path]]/page.js.nft.json	8.35kB	788.4kB	1.07%
../app/platform-redirect/page.js.nft.json	8.35kB	788.31kB	1.07%
../app/sitemap.xml/route.js.nft.json	8.35kB	785.79kB	1.07%

[ryan953]

Long term this'd be cool to convert into a lint rule, wired up like the https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-docs/blob/830bbc86fedd9c8461436946c2cf63246a6ad7cc/scripts/lint-404s/main.ts script.

But someone can do that in a followup PR. Short term i don't think we need to let that kind of thing slow down what's really a great #quickwin!

[coolguyzone]

Nice work! This will make the preview experience much smoother.

[chargome]

Nice! 🥇

TBH I don't think we really need to commit the entire script but maybe we can reuse parts of it for a GH action. We could only let this run on the diff of every PR, less expensive this way - leaving this up to @sergical

[sergical]

I have set aside some time to take a look at our 404 action, i will see what's the best usecase for this script/lint rule at that point as well, this is a huge win for now though, thank you @jas-kas!