Skip to content

Conversation

@gifflet
Copy link
Owner

@gifflet gifflet commented Mar 28, 2025

This PR implements a feature that automates the analysis of code changes, reducing the need for manual reviews and providing actionable suggestions directly in the CLI.

gifflet added 4 commits March 31, 2025 12:38
- Changed 'LoadConfig' to accept 'projectPath' as a parameter for better flexibility.
- Updated flag variable 'projectPath' to 'ProjectPath' to align with Go naming conventions.
- Introduced 'InitializeFlags' function to parse command-line flags before execution.
- Adjusted 'main.go' to call 'InitializeFlags' before loading configuration.
- Added OpenAI provider with functionality to generate text based on a prompt.
- Introduced an AI provider interface for easy addition of future AI providers.
- Updated configuration to support AI provider setup.
- Bumped Go version to 1.22.0 and updated dependencies.
- Introduced 'systemPrompt' in 'OpenAIProvider' to enable configurable system messages
- Refactored 'NewOpenAIProvider' to accept 'systemPrompt' for more contextual AI responses
- Replaced 'Provider' interface definition in 'ai/provider.go' with a structured 'types.Provider'
- Enhanced 'Config' to expose getter methods for AI configuration values
- Added default values for AI settings, including a default system prompt
- Created 'internal/types/common.go' to define AI provider interface and configuration abstraction
@gifflet gifflet force-pushed the feature/ia-code-review-integration branch from 23cb312 to 697fd04 Compare March 31, 2025 20:41
- Add Review struct and ReviewList type
- Implement GetSystemPrompt with default prompt
- Create Review function for AI-powered code analysis
- Add comprehensive tests for review functionality
- Update review command to use AI provider
- Handle both JSON and text format responses
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants