fix(gnovm): enforce int type for untyped variadic arguments in make

[ltzmaxwell]

No description provided.

[Gno2D2]

🛠 PR Checks Summary

All Automated Checks passed. ✅

Manual Checks (for Reviewers):

• IGNORE the bot requirements for this PR (force green CI check)

Read More

🤖 This bot helps streamline PR reviews by verifying automated checks and providing guidance for contributors and reviewers.

✅ Automated Checks (for Contributors):

🟢 Maintainers must be able to edit this pull request (more info)

☑️ Contributor Actions:

1. Fix any issues flagged by automated checks.
2. Follow the Contributor Checklist to ensure your PR is ready for review.
   • Add new tests, or document why they are unnecessary.
   • Provide clear examples/screenshots, if necessary.
   • Update documentation, if required.
   • Ensure no breaking changes, or include BREAKING CHANGE notes.
   • Link related issues/PRs, where applicable.

☑️ Reviewer Actions:

1. Complete manual checks for the PR, including the guidelines and additional checks if applicable.

📚 Resources:

• Report a bug with the bot.
• View the bot’s configuration file.

Debug

Automated Checks

Maintainers must be able to edit this pull request (more info)

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 And
    ├── 🟢 The base branch matches this pattern: ^master$
    └── 🟢 The pull request was created from a fork (head branch repo: ltzmaxwell/gno)

Then

🟢 Requirement satisfied
└── 🟢 Maintainer can modify this pull request

Manual Checks

**IGNORE** the bot requirements for this PR (force green CI check)

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 On every pull request

Can be checked by

• Any user with comment edit permission

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 80.30303% with 13 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
gnovm/pkg/gnolang/preprocess.go	81.66%	9 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
gnovm/pkg/gnolang/type_check.go	66.66%	2 Missing ⚠️

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

[thehowl]

also a proposal, why don't we make the arg in uverse Vrd(IntT())?

[ltzmaxwell]

also a proposal, why don't we make the arg in uverse Vrd(IntT())?

Vrd(IntT()) is too restrictive because it forces the variadic argument type in make's len/cap parameters to be exactly
int, whereas it should accept any integer type (such as uint, int32, etc.).

we can introduce a new constraint type to make it like Vrd(anyIntergerT()), but thus need some special handling in checkOrConvertType, it looks not worthy plus the overhead that the new constraint type definition introduced.

However, inspired by this, a check for typed arguments is added, as demonstrated in varg_3.gno.