Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @ericfe-google, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request resolves a potential naming conflict in Google Colab environments where BigQuery graph visualizers could clash with other visualizers, such as those for Spanner, if they used identical callback endpoint names. By introducing a "bigquery." prefix to the graph visualization callback names, this change ensures that BigQuery-specific visualizer functions are uniquely identified, preventing malfunctions and improving the robustness of interactive notebooks that integrate multiple data visualization tools. Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
…d Spanner. This avoids clashes if the same notebook uses visualizers for both BigQuery graphs and Spanner graphs, which can cause malfunctions in the visualizers.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request makes the Colab endpoint names for graph visualization unique for BigQuery to avoid clashes with Spanner. The changes correctly update the callback registration and the generated HTML. My review includes one suggestion to improve maintainability by replacing duplicated hardcoded strings with constants.
| params=query_result.to_json().replace("\\", "\\\\").replace('"', '\\"'), | ||
| ) | ||
| html_content = html_content.replace( | ||
| '"graph_visualization.Query"', '"bigquery.graph_visualization.Query"' | ||
| ) | ||
| html_content = html_content.replace( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The callback names are hardcoded here and also when registering the callbacks on lines 683 and 685. To improve maintainability and prevent potential bugs if these names need to be changed in the future, it would be better to define these strings as constants at the module level and reuse them in all relevant places.
For example:
# At module level
_BQ_GRAPH_QUERY_CALLBACK = "bigquery.graph_visualization.Query"
_BQ_GRAPH_NODE_EXPANSION_CALLBACK = "bigquery.graph_visualization.NodeExpansion"
_SPANNER_GRAPH_QUERY_CALLBACK = "graph_visualization.Query"
_SPANNER_GRAPH_NODE_EXPANSION_CALLBACK = "graph_visualization.NodeExpansion"
# In _add_graph_widget()
...
output.register_callback(_BQ_GRAPH_QUERY_CALLBACK, _colab_query_callback)
...
html_content = html_content.replace(
f'\"{_SPANNER_GRAPH_QUERY_CALLBACK}\"', f'\"{_BQ_GRAPH_QUERY_CALLBACK}\"'
)
...
…d Spanner. This avoids clashes if the same notebook uses visualizers for both BigQuery graphs and Spanner graphs, which can cause malfunctions in the visualizers.
Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there are a few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly:
Fixes #<issue_number_goes_here> 🦕