Skip to content

4.0 - Integrating neo4j apoc#62

Open
bradnussbaum wants to merge 131 commits into4.0from
4.0-int
Open

4.0 - Integrating neo4j apoc#62
bradnussbaum wants to merge 131 commits into4.0from
4.0-int

Conversation

@bradnussbaum
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

neoarchitect and others added 11 commits February 17, 2020 07:10
* Adding T4L feature from APOC 3.5

* Fixed double underscore issue on node labels for relTypeProperties

* Adding T4L feature from APOC 3.5

* Fixed double underscore issue on node labels for relTypeProperties

* Changes to error handling, etc, based on code review comments by sarmbruster

* Added tests for T4L

* Added asciidoc documentation for new procedures

* Rewrite of constraint checking mechanism for performance in T4L
@bradnussbaum bradnussbaum changed the title 4.0 - Integrating with neo4j 4.0 - Integrating neo4j apoc Feb 20, 2020
mneedham and others added 18 commits February 26, 2020 13:56
* expand wip

* refactoring path expander docs

* Pull out label filter as include

* pull out config explanation into its own includes

* tidy up formatting

* no config page anymore
* explain sequences

* better formatting of explanations

* create structure around expand subgraph page

* create structure around expand subgraph nodes page

* structure around spanning tree and sub graph nodes pages
* explain sequences

* better formatting of explanations

* more on expand

* expand config examples

* seq of rel types (not quite doing what I want at the moment)

* more examples
* explain sequences

* better formatting of explanations

* more on expand

* expand config examples

* seq of rel types (not quite doing what I want at the moment)

* more examples

* adding expand examples to expandConfig

* terminator and end nodes

* blacklist / whitelist

* BFS/DFS
The procedure now yeilds batchComputationResult in line with what is
documented.

Co-authored-by: Håkan Löfqvist <hakan.lofqvist@neo4j.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants