Skip to content

Conversation

@lallenfrancisl
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #49

@lallenfrancisl
Copy link
Contributor Author

lallenfrancisl commented Sep 1, 2022

I have also updated the validator and some old tests in consideration of the new parameter

@lallenfrancisl
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Marsup Could you review this ?

@kanongil
Copy link

I'm not a fan of adding support for a use case that is likely to inadvertently expose the tokens to standard logging tools.

The url including the query part is included in most HTTP server logs, and can also easily be exposed by clients through system logs. Probably better explained in this SO answer.

@lallenfrancisl
Copy link
Contributor Author

lallenfrancisl commented Mar 23, 2023

@kanongil But what about use cases like signed urls from signup links and stuff ? Isn't these best left to the user of the library ?

@lallenfrancisl
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kanongil @Marsup Any chance this can be re-evalutated ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Accept token from url search query param

2 participants