Move to bullet_stream function interface #91
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
colincasey
reviewed
Nov 18, 2025
schneems
force-pushed
the
schneems/print-interface
branch
from
9360995 to
e2a3d53
Compare
schneems
force-pushed
the
schneems/print-interface
branch
from
e2a3d53 to
d52a788
Compare
colincasey
approved these changes
Nov 19, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The original version of bullet_stream was named because it required threading a stateful print struct through your codebase. This provided minimal safety for a lot of extra overhead. We've since standardized on using the stateless "print" function interaces https://docs.rs/bullet_stream/0.11.0/bullet_stream/.