Skip to content

Security audit: API key exposure scan#2

Draft
Copilot wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
copilot/check-api-key-exposure
Draft

Security audit: API key exposure scan#2
Copilot wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
copilot/check-api-key-exposure

Conversation

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI commented Jan 20, 2026

Comprehensive scan for exposed API keys, tokens, and credentials across codebase and git history.

Scan Coverage

  • Pattern matching: API keys, tokens, secrets (OpenAI sk-*, GitHub ghp_*, AWS, etc.)
  • Full git history including deleted files
  • GitHub Actions workflows
  • All code and config files (.js, .mjs, .json, .yml, .html)

Results

Zero findings. No exposed credentials detected.

Repository security posture is strong:

  • .gitignore properly excludes .env* files
  • No hardcoded credentials in codebase
  • GitHub Actions uses proper permissions (no hardcoded secrets)
  • Single dependency: fast-xml-parser (public RSS parser only)

Documentation Added

  • SECURITY_SCAN_REPORT.md - Technical scan details, methodology, recommendations
  • SECURITY_SUMMARY.md - Quick reference for maintaining security posture
Original prompt

check if i exposed any api key in any repo


💬 We'd love your input! Share your thoughts on Copilot coding agent in our 2 minute survey.

Copilot AI and others added 2 commits January 20, 2026 21:26
Co-authored-by: hrco <4655956+hrco@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: hrco <4655956+hrco@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Verify API key exposure in repositories Security audit: API key exposure scan Jan 20, 2026
Copilot AI requested a review from hrco January 20, 2026 21:28
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@hrco hrco left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

well done

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants