Add 'h1-client-rustls' feature relying on rustls#292
Merged
Fishrock123 merged 1 commit intohttp-rs:mainfrom Mar 1, 2021
Merged
Add 'h1-client-rustls' feature relying on rustls#292Fishrock123 merged 1 commit intohttp-rs:mainfrom
Fishrock123 merged 1 commit intohttp-rs:mainfrom
Conversation
c29606b to
0141f9c
Compare
This PR is a follow-up of http-rs/http-client#53 and addresses http-rs#40. It adds a `h1-client-rustls` feature using `http-client/rustls` feature introduced by http-rs/http-client#53. Co-Authored-By: Julien Enoch <julien.enoch@adlinktech.com>
0141f9c to
1adb821
Compare
This was referenced Mar 1, 2021
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is a follow-up of http-rs/http-client#53 and addresses #40.
It adds a
h1-client-rustlsfeature usinghttp-client/rustlsfeature introduced by http-rs/http-client#53.Co-Authored-By: Julien Enoch julien.enoch@adlinktech.com
Successor to #271 so I can hopefully merge and release today. That PR took changes on which were my own suggestion but which do not actually work correctly (no default tls support) for which I am sorry...