-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
Fix long message handling with dynamic buffer growth #158
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix long message handling with dynamic buffer growth #158
Conversation
The socket transport plugin used a fixed 64KB buffer size which caused messages surpassing that size to be truncated For UDP/Unix datagram sockets, this resulted in parsing errors like "unexpected end of input" This change allows the buffer to grow (up to a limit depending on the protocol) to accommodate larger messages. Closes: OSPRH-23826
|
Still working on unit tests |
Use sendTCPSocketMessage name instead
vyzigold
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see one thing in the tests (see my comment) which needs a change / discussion. But otherwise this looks quite good. Thank you for the cleanup of the tests!
| assert.Equal(t, true, len(receivedMsg) > 0) | ||
|
|
||
| // If we received a complete message, verify the content | ||
| if len(receivedMsg) == largeBuffSize+len(addition) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm. Does it actually get inside this if? If I understand it correctly. You're sending a 128kb message, but the socket buffer hasn't expanded yet (it's still set to 64kb), so a truncated string is received and sent further (which means only the first half of the sent message gets assigned to receivedMsg right?). So this condition would be 64kb == 128kb + 19. So even though the test passes, I don't think the code inside the condition ever executes.
What I think should happen in this testcase:
- Send the large message +
addition - Optionally check that receivedMsg only has the first half of the message
- Send the same message again
- Check that we now have 128kb of data with the last character being '$'
- Send the same message again
- Check that we now have 128kb + 19 bytes of data and the end is "wubba lubba dub dub"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch! Indeed, we should extend this test to send a large message, catch the log message and verify we only received the base buffer size and then retry sending a long message and see it succeeds. I will fix this.
|
Thanks for the review! |
This test verifies the dynamic buffer growth by sending three messages In each iteration the buffer grows from the initial size of 65535 bytes to 3 times the initial size. Also verifies the content of the received message
| assert.Equal(t, true, len(receivedMsg) > 0) | ||
|
|
||
| // If we received a complete message, verify the content | ||
| if len(receivedMsg) == largeBuffSize+len(addition) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch! Indeed, we should extend this test to send a large message, catch the log message and verify we only received the base buffer size and then retry sending a long message and see it succeeds. I will fix this.
The socket transport plugin used a fixed 64KB buffer size which caused messages surpassing that size to be truncated
For UDP/Unix datagram sockets, this resulted in parsing errors like "unexpected end of input"
This change allows the buffer to grow (up to a limit depending on the protocol) to accommodate larger messages.
Closes: OSPRH-23826