Test #72
Test #72
Conversation
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR adds a new field to the partner model in an Odoo module. The change appears to be incomplete or experimental based on the generic naming and lack of integration.
- Adds
test_fieldas a new Char field to the res.partner model - Updates translation file with auto-generated entries for the new field
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| partner_sales_abc/models/res_partner.py | Adds new test_field Char field to partner model without descriptive label or clear purpose |
| partner_sales_abc/i18n/partner_sales_abc.pot | Updates translation timestamps and adds auto-generated translation entries for the new test_field |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
| class partner(models.Model): | ||
| _inherit = "res.partner" | ||
| abc_sales_amount = fields.Char("ABC Sales amount 7") | ||
| test_field = fields.Char() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The new field test_field lacks a descriptive label/string parameter. Unlike the existing abc_sales_amount field which has the label "ABC Sales amount 7", this field only shows "Test Field" (auto-generated). Consider adding a meaningful label, e.g., fields.Char("Description of field purpose").
| test_field = fields.Char() | |
| test_field = fields.Char("Test Field Purpose") |
| class partner(models.Model): | ||
| _inherit = "res.partner" | ||
| abc_sales_amount = fields.Char("ABC Sales amount 7") | ||
| test_field = fields.Char() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The field name test_field is not descriptive and appears to be a placeholder. Use a meaningful name that describes the field's purpose and aligns with business requirements. Field names like "test_field" should not be added to production code.
| test_field = fields.Char() |
No description provided.