feat: Migrate component definitions from DA to XWalk plugins and standardize model file naming with an underscore prefix.#6
Conversation
…dardize model file naming with an underscore prefix.
|
Hello, I'm the AEM Code Sync Bot and I will run some actions to deploy your branch and validate page speed.
Commits
|
Summary of ChangesHello @tusharmane-tm, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly refactors the component definition and model system by migrating from an older 'DA' plugin framework to a more modern 'XWalk' plugin architecture. This change not only standardizes component configurations and introduces new, more flexible component models but also streamlines the file naming conventions for better organization and maintainability. The overall impact is an improved foundation for component development and content management. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request is a significant refactoring that migrates component definitions from the legacy da format to the new xwalk plugins and reorganizes the component model files into a more modular structure. The changes are well-structured and improve the project's maintainability. I've identified a few issues, including a potential accessibility regression, a typo, and some inconsistencies that should be addressed. Overall, this is a great improvement.
| "options": [ | ||
| { | ||
| "name": "1 Column", | ||
| "value": "table" | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "name": "2 Columns", | ||
| "value": "table-2-columns" | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "name": "3 Columns", | ||
| "value": "table-3-columns" | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "name": "4 Columns", | ||
| "value": "table-4-columns" | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "name": "5 Columns", | ||
| "value": "table-5-columns" | ||
| } | ||
| ] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The select component for the number of columns in a table includes an option for "5 Columns" (table-5-columns), but there are no corresponding definitions, models, or filters for a 5-column table in this file. This will cause an error if a user selects that option. Please either remove the "5 Columns" option or implement the necessary configurations for it.
"options": [
{
"name": "1 Column",
"value": "table"
},
{
"name": "2 Columns",
"value": "table-2-columns"
},
{
"name": "3 Columns",
"value": "table-3-columns"
},
{
"name": "4 Columns",
"value": "table-4-columns"
}
]| "label": "Background Image Alt" | ||
| "name": "media_imageAlt", | ||
| "value": "", | ||
| "label": "Bacgkround Alt" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There's a typo in the label. It should be "Background Alt".
| "label": "Bacgkround Alt" | |
| "label": "Background Alt" |
| { | ||
| "component": "richtext", | ||
| "component": "text", | ||
| "valueType": "string", | ||
| "name": "div:nth-child(1)", | ||
| "name": "summary", | ||
| "value": "", | ||
| "label": "Summary", | ||
| "required": true | ||
| "label": "Summary" | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The required: true property was removed from the summary field in the accordion-item model. If this field is intended to be mandatory, this is a regression. Please consider adding "required": true back if the summary is essential for this component.
{
"component": "text",
"valueType": "string",
"name": "summary",
"value": "",
"label": "Summary",
"required": true
}| { | ||
| "component": "richtext", | ||
| "valueType": "string", | ||
| "name": "div:nth-child(1)>div:nth-child(1)", | ||
| "label": "Quote", | ||
| "required": true | ||
| "name": "quotation", | ||
| "value": "", | ||
| "label": "Quotation" | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The required: true property was removed from the quotation field in the quote model. If a quote must have a quotation, this is a regression. Please consider re-adding "required": true to ensure data integrity.
{
"component": "richtext",
"valueType": "string",
"name": "quotation",
"value": "",
"label": "Quotation",
"required": true
}1 participant
Please always provide the GitHub issue(s) your PR is for, as well as test URLs where your change can be observed (before and after):
Test URLs: