⚡ Bolt: Use XFlush instead of XSync in drw_map#179
⚡ Bolt: Use XFlush instead of XSync in drw_map#179google-labs-jules[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intodevfrom
Conversation
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
|
Important Review skippedBot user detected. To trigger a single review, invoke the You can disable this status message by setting the Comment |
⚡ Bolt: Use XFlush instead of XSync in drw_map
💡 What: Replaced
XSync(drw->dpy, False)withXFlush(drw->dpy)indrw.c.🎯 Why:
XSyncforces a blocking round-trip to the X server after every drawing operation (e.g., status bar updates). This causes unnecessary latency and reduces rendering throughput.XFlushsends the commands without blocking, which is sufficient for drawing operations.📊 Impact: Improves responsiveness of UI updates (status bar, window titles) by eliminating blocking waits.
🔬 Measurement: Verified compilation and code correctness. The change aligns with X11 performance best practices.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 6857467082055038038 started by @paperbenni