-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 807
[SYCL][UR] Do not call urDeviceRetain()
in device_impl
constructor at all
#20065
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
ldorau
wants to merge
1
commit into
intel:sycl
Choose a base branch
from
ldorau:Do_not_call_DeviceRetain_in_constructor_of_device_impl
base: sycl
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+5
−10
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems a bit off that ref count is zero here, because callback for urDeviceGet (redefinedDevicesGetAfter) increments the DevRefCounter. So, even if we don't call Retain anymore, ref count is still expected to be at least 1 because of urDevicesGet. It would be nice to either understand why it is normal to have zero ref count here or to update the test if necessary if there is something wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@againull I have debugged this unittest. It calls 3 times
platform_impl::getDevicesImplHelper()
:llvm/sycl/source/detail/platform_impl.cpp
Line 497 in 6b29cf1
urDeviceGet(NumDevices == 0)
what setsDevRefCounter == 0
(usingredefinedDevicesGetAfter()
):llvm/sycl/source/detail/platform_impl.cpp
Lines 502 to 504 in 6b29cf1
urDeviceGet(NumDevices == 1)
what setsDevRefCounter == 1
(usingredefinedDevicesGetAfter()
):llvm/sycl/source/detail/platform_impl.cpp
Lines 527 to 530 in 6b29cf1
urDeviceRelease()
on this device what decrementsDevRefCounter
to0
(usingredefinedDeviceReleaseAfter()
):llvm/sycl/source/detail/platform_impl.cpp
Lines 560 to 563 in 6b29cf1
... what looks like:
@againull Does it make sense or is there anything wrong here?