Skip to content

format the html #12

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
Achu-Worifung wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

format the html #12

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
25 changes: 16 additions & 9 deletions index.html
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,16 +1,21 @@
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
<h1>SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES</h1>

Brown v. Board of Education
347 U.S. 483 (1954) (USSC+)
<h3> Brown v. Board of Education</h3>
<h3>347 U.S. 483 (1954) (USSC+)</h3>

Argued December 9, 1952
<p>Argued December 9, 1952
Reargued December 8, 1953
Decided May 17, 1954
Decided May 17, 1954</p>

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS*
<h2>APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS*</h2>

[PHOTO]
Integration at Ole Miss Univ. MST 10/9/62. Photo by Warren K. Leffler (link)
<img Src = "./integrated_classroom.jpg" alt = "Integrated Classroom" width = "400" height = "300">
<p>

Integration at Ole Miss Univ. MST 10/9/62. Photo by Warren K. Leffler (link)
</p>

<pre>

Syllabus

Expand All @@ -28,7 +33,7 @@
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WARREN delivered the opinion of the Court.

These cases come to us from the States of Kansas, South Carolina, Virginia, and Delaware. They are premised on different facts and different local conditions, but a common legal question justifies their consideration together in this consolidated opinion.

In each of the cases, minors of the Negro race, through their legal representatives, seek the aid of the courts in obtaining admission to the public schools of their community on a nonsegregated basis. In each instance, they had been denied admission to schools attended by white children under laws requiring or permitting segregation according to race. This segregation was alleged to deprive the plaintiffs of the equal protection of the laws under the Fourteenth Amendment. In each of the cases other than the Delaware case, a three-judge federal district court denied relief to the plaintiffs on the so-called "separate but equal" doctrine announced by this Court in Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537. Under that doctrine, equality of treatment is accorded when the races are provided substantially equal facilities, even though these facilities be separate. In the Delaware case, the Supreme Court of Delaware adhered to that doctrine, but ordered that the plaintiffs be admitted to the white schools because of their superiority to the Negro schools.

The plaintiffs contend that segregated public schools are not "equal" and cannot be made "equal," and that hence they are deprived of the equal protection of the laws. Because of the obvious importance of the question presented, the Court took jurisdiction. Argument was heard in the 1952 Term, and reargument was heard this Term on certain questions propounded by the Court.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -80,3 +85,5 @@
Robert H. Jackson (1941-1954)
Harold H. Burton (1945-1958)
Sherman Minton (1949-1956)

</pre>