Propagate missing session params#332
Conversation
|
Hi, I've noticed that the project code usually makes use of I've written the code using Thanks in advance. All the best, |
|
Thanks, Jorge, for the changes. They look good. This is just a 3rd party review. I am not the maintainer of this project. I think that these are important changes and they are worth a mention in the release notes. https://github.com/jborean93/smbprotocol/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md Regarding:
I think that for the new code, we can start using better practices. Would it be possible to add some tests to make sure that these arguments work as expected and that we will not introduce regression with future refactoring ? Thanks again |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #332 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 99.03% 99.03%
=======================================
Files 24 24
Lines 5177 5177
=======================================
Hits 5127 5127
Misses 50 50
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
I really need to sit down and think of a better way to provide these options vs trying to smuggle them through the While using |
Issue:
Some
register_sessionparameters are not being propagated throughget_smb_tree, which limits their usage.Changelog:
auth_protocolandrequire_signingto theget_smb_treeconnection kwargs.