Conversation
|
The real difference here is that Not that I am against the change, but it is rather a new feature than a code cleanup |
|
@StefanSpieker what do you think? |
|
I was not aware of that fact. I think we should then just close the PR. In jenkins there is no not deprecated functionality for that. Was it intended to perspectively remove this functionality? |
|
jenkinsci/jenkins#4211 from @KostyaSha somewhat improves this situation by offering explicit API for persisted actions. Until that PR is integrated, I would prefer not to integrate this change. Performance is probably more important than the code cleaningness. But it would be great to add a TODO comment so that we eventually adopt a new API method |
|
So jenkinsci/jenkins#4211 was closed @StefanSpieker. Should we recover it? |
A new pull request which has only the change getEnvInjectAction. But from my point of view it will not really change the interface. It still returns an action, although it uses internally a List of Actions or classes which extend the Action class.