fix: allow :build_type to be specified in any order
#6
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Can this be merged ? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #4
First off -- thank you for this plugin! What a game changer! Has been working out great.
This PR fixes a small logic bug that required
:build_typeto always be the first option.While iterating through the
|k,v|entries ofoptions, the intent was to only operate on:build_type.Previously, the check was
next if not options.key?(Pod::UserOption.keyword)("does :build_type exist?")This would be
trueeven ifkwas not:build_type, causing the wrong key to be operated on (unlessbuild_typewas first)This PR changes the check to
next if k != Pod::UserOption.keyword, and I have verified that this results in the intended behavior.However, I'm not totally sure how to implement tests of this behavior -- I don't work in ruby very often. Happy to help with that if you have any guidance, though!
Thank you for reviewing!