Skip to content

Conversation

@christian-schilling
Copy link
Member

We didn't realize that we can use those existing functions instead
of creating a new one.
Going via pathstree() and populate() might not be the absolute best possible
route, but those use memoization and should be much faster for repeated
application that the transpose() which always needs to look at all paths.

@christian-schilling christian-schilling force-pushed the @changes/master/christian.schilling.de@gmail.com/rm-transpose branch 2 times, most recently from 3a1b22d to 97e598f Compare November 17, 2025 07:24
@vlad-ivanov-name vlad-ivanov-name marked this pull request as ready for review November 17, 2025 07:26
We didn't realize that we can use those existing functions instead
of creating a new one.
Going via pathstree() and populate() might not be the absolute best possible
route, but those use memoization and should be much faster for repeated
application that the transpose() which always needs to look at all paths.
@christian-schilling christian-schilling force-pushed the @changes/master/christian.schilling.de@gmail.com/rm-transpose branch from 97e598f to d9e716b Compare November 17, 2025 08:00
@christian-schilling christian-schilling added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 17, 2025
Merged via the queue into master with commit 9aad499 Nov 17, 2025
1 check passed
@christian-schilling christian-schilling deleted the @changes/master/christian.schilling.de@gmail.com/rm-transpose branch November 17, 2025 08:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants