Skip to content

Conversation

@CWDamm-Kint
Copy link
Collaborator

These changes include:

  • Reordering Activities, Heritage Assets and Finds, so that they match the specification
  • Renaming various cards
  • Reorganising hierarchy of the Discovery node group, so that Finder and Identifier are the nodes on a separated card
  • Fixing the search export field name for 'Place Address'
  • Separating Artefact Nodes into a separate card, so that it can have its own permissions
  • Renaming conservation notes and putting it on a separate card for permissions
  • Putting HER number in the Name card for Finds, consistent with the other models
  • Make Alternative Name in Activities visible
  • Delete 'building broad period'
  • Making archives and collections n cardinality
  • Replacing the values for the 'Condition when Reported' concept collection (accidentally this data was not previously imported)

Copy link
Member

@samuelscandrett samuelscandrett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm still unsure about the structure with having notes as a separate card child of description - it seems like an odd workflow for a user to be required to create a description tile in order to access notes. In an ideal world we would have them both in the same card, but since we need to apply permissions on the notes widget (which doesn't seem to be possible, rather needs to be applied on the entire card) it needs to be moved to a separate card.

I'd double check with the wider dev community whether permissions definitely can't be applied on invidivual widgets within a card, and if this is a requirement is the only solution to move to a separate card.

If this is the only solution, I think it makes the most sense to exist as an entirely separate nodegroup off the root node, and thus in a separate, but unique, card.

Copy link
Member

@samuelscandrett samuelscandrett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, looks good to me

@samuelscandrett samuelscandrett merged commit 19db02d into project/7.6.x Dec 4, 2025
6 checks passed
@samuelscandrett samuelscandrett deleted the changes_to_graphs branch December 4, 2025 14:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants