-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 74
Allow VolumeAttributesClassName changes in storageConfig webhook #921
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
SreedevT
wants to merge
1
commit into
k8ssandra:master
Choose a base branch
from
SreedevT:fix/allow-vac-changes-in-storage-webhook
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This isn't strictly true, the StorageClass must support ModifyVolume. Also, did you verify if the StatefulSet controller accepts these changes and applies them?
There is also no monitoring in here that the VolumeAttributesClass change has been approved as the CSI driver can reject it. That would require changes like the resizing parameter checks and correct reconciliation until the change has been approved.
This is relevant because in some drivers such as AWS, one can change from gp2 to gp3 and this operation might not be instant and as such will require the operator to correctly wait for the changes to be applied. There are also restrictions on how many times per day such operations can be done and we can't set the datacenter to a ready state if the changes haven't been applied (or for example incorrect / outdated parameters are used).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thats fair, I have made the PR a draft. Current PR only bypasses the validation and does not make any changes.
Can I make it a gated feature with more checks in place?