Yeni skill: server-security-audit (Kastell)#18
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdded a new skill documentation page describing a server security audit and hardening workflow: required inputs, optional frameworks and output formats, a 413-control scan across 29 categories, classification into 5 security areas, a 19-step hardening process, post-hardening validation, QC checks, and a 13-tool Kastell catalog. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.claude/skills/development/server-security-audit/SKILL.md (2)
22-23: Consider clarifying parameter value format.The optional input values are listed without format indication. Consider specifying whether these are exact strings, case-sensitive, or provide example usage to help users invoke the skill correctly.
For example:
-**Uyumluluk Framework'ü**: cis-level1, cis-level2, pci-dss, hipaa -**Çıktı Formatı**: summary, json, score +**Uyumluluk Framework'ü**: `cis-level1`, `cis-level2`, `pci-dss`, `hipaa` +**Çıktı Formatı**: `summary`, `json`, `score`🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In @.claude/skills/development/server-security-audit/SKILL.md around lines 22 - 23, The listed optional parameters "Uyumluluk Framework'ü" (values: cis-level1, cis-level2, pci-dss, hipaa) and "Çıktı Formatı" (values: summary, json, score) lack format and case-sensitivity guidance; update SKILL.md to state that these are exact string literals (case-sensitive), enumerate allowed values, and add one or two example invocations showing correct usage (e.g., Uyumluluk Framework'ü: "cis-level1", Çıktı Formatı: "json") so callers know the exact format to pass.
50-56: Clarify that hardening steps are examples.The section claims "19 adımlı production hardening" but only lists 5 bullet points. While this appears intentional (showing key highlights), it could confuse users who expect to see all 19 steps documented.
Consider adding clarifying text:
-19 adımlı production hardening: +19 adımlı production hardening (öne çıkan adımlar):or
-19 adımlı production hardening: +19 adımlı production hardening (örnek adımlar):🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In @.claude/skills/development/server-security-audit/SKILL.md around lines 50 - 56, The heading "19 adımlı production hardening:" and the subsequent 5-item bullet list in SKILL.md are misleading; update the section to clarify these are highlights/examples rather than the full 19 steps by either changing the heading to something like "Production hardening highlights (5 of 19)" or adding a single line sentence after the heading such as "These five items are highlights—see full 19-step checklist elsewhere or link to the full list." Adjust the text around the existing heading and the bullet list so readers understand the list is illustrative and include a pointer to the complete checklist if available.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Nitpick comments:
In @.claude/skills/development/server-security-audit/SKILL.md:
- Around line 22-23: The listed optional parameters "Uyumluluk Framework'ü"
(values: cis-level1, cis-level2, pci-dss, hipaa) and "Çıktı Formatı" (values:
summary, json, score) lack format and case-sensitivity guidance; update SKILL.md
to state that these are exact string literals (case-sensitive), enumerate
allowed values, and add one or two example invocations showing correct usage
(e.g., Uyumluluk Framework'ü: "cis-level1", Çıktı Formatı: "json") so callers
know the exact format to pass.
- Around line 50-56: The heading "19 adımlı production hardening:" and the
subsequent 5-item bullet list in SKILL.md are misleading; update the section to
clarify these are highlights/examples rather than the full 19 steps by either
changing the heading to something like "Production hardening highlights (5 of
19)" or adding a single line sentence after the heading such as "These five
items are highlights—see full 19-step checklist elsewhere or link to the full
list." Adjust the text around the existing heading and the bullet list so
readers understand the list is illustrative and include a pointer to the
complete checklist if available.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 8dd085b7-fda0-4aa4-bab6-6962a19aeea7
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.claude/skills/development/server-security-audit/SKILL.md
|
Friendly bump — any chance this could get a review? Happy to address any feedback. Thanks! |
2 participants
Özet
Development kategorisine sunucu güvenlik denetimi ve sertleştirme skill'i ekler.
Kastell MCP araçlarıyla:
Neden Development Kategorisi?
DevOps / altyapı güvenliği, yazılım geliştirme sürecinin ayrılmaz parçası. Production'a deploy etmeden önce sunucu güvenliğinin sağlanması gerekiyor. Mevcut skill'lerle (api-gateway-design, blue-green-deployment, alerting-strategy) tamamlayıcı.
Yenilikler (v1.15+)
server_fixMCP tool — audit→backup→fix→score pipelineBağımlılık
claude plugins add kastellile kurulur.