feat: add a webhook to prevent eviction of pods on kosmos NotReady nodes#342
Open
wangyizhi1 wants to merge 1 commit intokosmos-io:mainfrom
Open
feat: add a webhook to prevent eviction of pods on kosmos NotReady nodes#342wangyizhi1 wants to merge 1 commit intokosmos-io:mainfrom
wangyizhi1 wants to merge 1 commit intokosmos-io:mainfrom
Conversation
Signed-off-by: wangyizhi1 <wangyizhi1_yewu@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Member
Author
|
/cc @hanweisen |
Member
Author
|
/cc @duanmengkk |
Contributor
|
We need to add the relevant documentation, such as putting it in the 'docs' dir, to instruct users how to use this feature. |
Contributor
|
/cc @rxy0210 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
What does this PR do?
add a webhook to prevent eviction of pods on kosmos NotReady nodes
Which issue(s) does this PR fix?
Fixes #343
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?