Skip to content

Conversation

@nrueh
Copy link
Contributor

@nrueh nrueh commented Oct 9, 2025

No description provided.

@nrueh nrueh requested a review from tortinator October 9, 2025 21:10
krr.bib Outdated
doi = {10.1007/978-3-031-61874-1},
publisher = springer,
series = {Springer Briefs in Computer Science},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61874-1},
Copy link
Contributor

@tortinator tortinator Oct 10, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61874-1},
doi = {10.1007/978-3-031-61874-1},

So denke ich, ist es schick :)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ich war mir nicht mehr ganz sicher. Aber sollten wir die URL dann nicht ganz rausnehmen? Es gibt auch ein separates Feld für DOI, das jetzt identisch wäre mit der URL.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ahrgg, da hab' ich gar nicht hingeguckt - das Feld sollte dann 'doi' sein 😇

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also die URL dann ganz rausnehmen?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hab's oben angepasst

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, das meinte ich nicht...das DOI Feld war schon da. Jetzt ist es zweimal drin. Deswegen sind die Checks vielleicht auch gefailed?

krr.bib Outdated
doi = {10.1007/978-3-031-61874-1},
publisher = springer,
series = {Springer Briefs in Computer Science},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61874-1},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hab's oben angepasst

@tortinator tortinator merged commit 922e065 into master Oct 10, 2025
1 check failed
@tortinator tortinator deleted the nico/feature-models-book branch October 10, 2025 08:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants