Skip to content

🧭 DocOps: docs + GitHub workflows#1102

Open
kuasar-mknd wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
docops/docs-and-workflows-6215580099620308915
Open

🧭 DocOps: docs + GitHub workflows#1102
kuasar-mknd wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
docops/docs-and-workflows-6215580099620308915

Conversation

@kuasar-mknd
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

What docs changed

  • README.md: Removed an invalid --legacy-peer-deps flag on pnpm install commands that would cause installation failures for users. Updated the pnpm version badge and prerequisites text from 8+ to 10+ to match what is currently enforced in .github/workflows/ci.yml.
  • .jules/docops-history.md: Added an entry reflecting this audit and update, noting that the documentation already perfectly reflects the Astro SSG architecture.

What workflows were added

  • None were required. Existing workflows (ci.yml, codeql.yml, dependency-review.yml, dependabot.yml) are fully present, functional, and correctly scoped.

How to verify

  1. Run pnpm run check and ensure it passes formatting and linting.
  2. Run bun test src/ tests/ to verify local unit testing.

Notes

  • Package Manager: pnpm detected via pnpm-lock.yaml.
  • Node Version: 20 (inferred from ci.yml and README.md).
  • As per memory rules, the truthful documentation detailing the static Astro SSG architecture was preserved, and no "ghost" endpoints or databases were hallucinatory documented.

PR created automatically by Jules for task 6215580099620308915 started by @kuasar-mknd

- Removed invalid `--legacy-peer-deps` flag from `pnpm install` commands in README.md as pnpm does not support it.
- Updated `pnpm` version requirement text and badge in README.md to v10+ to match current CI environment requirements.
- Validated existing GitHub workflows and documentation are thoroughly accurate (Astro SSG site, not a Hono dynamic backend).
- Appended audit log to `.jules/docops-history.md`.
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant