-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
Allow single-field named structs to be transparent #3971
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Xiretza
wants to merge
1
commit into
launchbadge:main
Choose a base branch
from
Xiretza:transparent-named-structs
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+40
−31
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -7,34 +7,32 @@ use quote::{quote, quote_spanned}; | |
use syn::punctuated::Punctuated; | ||
use syn::token::Comma; | ||
use syn::{ | ||
parse_quote, Data, DataEnum, DataStruct, DeriveInput, Field, Fields, FieldsNamed, | ||
FieldsUnnamed, Variant, | ||
parse_quote, Data, DataEnum, DataStruct, DeriveInput, Field, Fields, FieldsNamed, Variant, | ||
}; | ||
|
||
pub fn expand_derive_type(input: &DeriveInput) -> syn::Result<TokenStream> { | ||
let attrs = parse_container_attributes(&input.attrs)?; | ||
match &input.data { | ||
// Newtype structs: | ||
// struct Foo(i32); | ||
Data::Struct(DataStruct { | ||
fields: Fields::Unnamed(FieldsUnnamed { unnamed, .. }), | ||
.. | ||
}) => { | ||
if unnamed.len() == 1 { | ||
expand_derive_has_sql_type_transparent(input, unnamed.first().unwrap()) | ||
} else { | ||
Err(syn::Error::new_spanned( | ||
input, | ||
"structs with zero or more than one unnamed field are not supported", | ||
)) | ||
} | ||
Data::Struct(DataStruct { fields, .. }) | ||
if fields.len() == 1 && (matches!(fields, Fields::Unnamed(_)) || attrs.transparent) => | ||
{ | ||
expand_derive_has_sql_type_transparent(input, fields.iter().next().unwrap()) | ||
} | ||
// Record types | ||
// struct Foo { foo: i32, bar: String } | ||
Data::Struct(DataStruct { | ||
fields: Fields::Named(FieldsNamed { named, .. }), | ||
.. | ||
}) => expand_derive_has_sql_type_struct(input, named), | ||
Data::Struct(DataStruct { | ||
fields: Fields::Unnamed(..), | ||
.. | ||
}) => Err(syn::Error::new_spanned( | ||
input, | ||
"structs with zero or more than one unnamed field are not supported", | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. In hindsight, this wording is really clunky. How about: |
||
)), | ||
Data::Struct(DataStruct { | ||
fields: Fields::Unit, | ||
.. | ||
|
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You should change the following assert to mention that
#[sqlx(transparent)]
is only allowed on tuple structs or structs with a single named field:sqlx/sqlx-macros-core/src/derives/attributes.rs
Lines 282 to 286 in e77f32e
Otherwise if the user adds one field, they'll just get a confusing
unexpected #[sqlx(transparent)]
error.