pb-3494: vendor latest kdmp repo from 1.2.4 branch#1274
Open
siva-portworx wants to merge 18 commits intomasterfrom
Open
pb-3494: vendor latest kdmp repo from 1.2.4 branch#1274siva-portworx wants to merge 18 commits intomasterfrom
siva-portworx wants to merge 18 commits intomasterfrom
Conversation
* PB-3397: Add Logic to support namespace label selector in the application backup controller - These feature is supported with manual and schedule backups - Currently Namespaces come along the application backup spec consider to be backed up, Now these namespaces are selected using the namespace selectors provided as part of the same spec at execution time. - Filtered namespaces that to be backed up are also updated to the data-store object while reconciling.
Signed-off-by: Rohit-PX <rkulkarni@purestorage.com>
Signed-off-by: Kesavan Thiruvenkadasamy <kthiruvenkadasamy@purestorage.com>
Signed-off-by: Kesavan Thiruvenkadasamy <kthiruvenkadasamy@purestorage.com>
Signed-off-by: Kesavan Thiruvenkadasamy <kthiruvenkadasamy@purestorage.com>
* Added test for Clone PVCs after DR on destination cluster * Added test for Clone PVCs after DR on dest cluster * modified test to chec pvc bound * modified test to check pvc bound * Addressed review comments * Added changes to use storageclassName instead of storage class in annotations for clone pvc test --------- Co-authored-by: root <root@geet-test-source-1.cluster.local> Co-authored-by: GEET JAIN <getjain@purestorage.com> Co-authored-by: geet <geet@DevBox.myguest.virtualbox.org> Co-authored-by: root <root@crdtest-4.cluster.local> Co-authored-by: Rohit-PX <32072909+Rohit-PX@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Priyanshu Pandey <ppandey@purestorage.com>
siva-portworx
requested review from
diptiranjanpx,
lalat-das,
prashanthpx and
px-kesavan
Collaborator
|
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
siva-portworx
force-pushed
the
pb-3494
branch
from
a77868b to
4ecc201
Compare
lalat-das
approved these changes
Feb 8, 2023
siva-portworx
force-pushed
the
pb-3494
branch
2 times, most recently
from
7de03f9 to
cbd024e
Compare
siva-portworx
force-pushed
the
pb-3494
branch
from
cbd024e to
b2b0d4a
Compare
Signed-off-by: Priyanshu Pandey <ppandey@purestorage.com>
siva-portworx
force-pushed
the
pb-3494
branch
from
b2b0d4a to
a0df07a
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
8 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What type of PR is this?
What this PR does / why we need it:
Does this PR change a user-facing CRD or CLI?:
no
Is a release note needed?:
Does this change need to be cherry-picked to a release branch?:
no