Skip to content

Feature/lxl 4504 cataloguing items#1073

Closed
lrosenstrom wants to merge 11 commits intodevelopfrom
feature/lxl-4504-cataloguing-copies
Closed

Feature/lxl 4504 cataloguing items#1073
lrosenstrom wants to merge 11 commits intodevelopfrom
feature/lxl-4504-cataloguing-copies

Conversation

@lrosenstrom
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@lrosenstrom lrosenstrom commented Jun 25, 2024

Tickets involved

LXL-4504

Solves

Support for creating and displaying of IDs when cataloguing items*.

Summary of changes

  • Make it possible to add an ID to a copy by clicking the "vertical ellipsis" icon next to the add button. The client creates a temporary ID that is replaced by a backend-generated ID on save
  • Display IDs in the upper right corner of local items as long as some conditions are fulfilled (is a hasComponent entry and has an @id)
  • Support for showing "ID-labels" as added or removed in the history view

TODO:

  • When trying to link to a copy by adding e.g. a relatedTo field and searching for the copy's ID in the right search panel, the only hits are the instance and item containing the copy. How should this work? Are backend changes needed?
  • Show reverse relations for copies, i.e. a (smaller than the current standard?) button, displaying the number of links to the copy, and the entities containing the links when clicking the button.

* "Exemplar" in Swedish.

@lrosenstrom lrosenstrom marked this pull request as draft June 25, 2024 12:42
@olovy olovy changed the title Feature/lxl 4504 cataloguing copies Feature/lxl 4504 cataloguing items Jul 30, 2024
@jesperengstrom
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@lrosenstrom can we close this?

@olovy olovy closed this Mar 18, 2025
@olovy olovy deleted the feature/lxl-4504-cataloguing-copies branch March 18, 2025 13:19
@lrosenstrom
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@lrosenstrom can we close this?

Yes! This was replaced by #1091

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants