Conversation
|
@PoignardAzur and @Philipp-M as announced, here is a PR that removes the |
PoignardAzur
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Really appreciate that you took the time to do that refactor!
We haven't had a big discussion about whether we want to remove ViewArgument, but as your PR shows, we're not using it anyway, and Xilem doesn't really have any maintainers right now, so I'll make a judgment call and say we can merge this without delay.
|
There were changes on the main branch in between... I'll fix that in a minute. |
|
I'm a little too late to the party it seems. I have just been using this feature to ease on unwrapping in handlers. I guess it is refactor time for me. 😢 |
What exactly do you mean by that? |
Motivated by #1638 (comment) this PR basically reverts #1444.