fix: Correct serialization of command count in SDynamicLayerUnitData

[Kakueeen]

Updated the serialization method to cast the command count to an integer before outputting, ensuring proper data type handling.

Log: fix bug
Bug: https://pms.uniontech.com/bug-view-327629.html

Summary by Sourcery

Bug Fixes:

• Cast the command count to an integer when serializing SDynamicLayerUnitData to ensure correct data type

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)

Reviewer's Guide

Ensure proper serialization of the command count by casting to int before output, addressing data type consistency.

Class diagram for SDynamicLayerUnitData serialization update

classDiagram
    class SDynamicLayerUnitData {
        +baseImg
        +blocked
        +layerType
        +commands
        +serialization(out)
    }
    class Command {
        +cmdType()
        +serialization(out)
    }
    SDynamicLayerUnitData "1" o-- "*" Command : commands
    SDynamicLayerUnitData : serialization(out)
    %% Highlight change: command count is now cast to int during serialization

Loading

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Serialize command count as integer	Replaced out << layUnit.commands.count() with out << static_cast(layUnit.commands.count())	src/drawshape/sitemdata.h

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey there - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[github-actions]

TAG Bot

TAG: 6.5.31
EXISTED: no
DISTRIBUTION: unstable

[deepin-ci-robot]

deepin pr auto review

根据提供的git diff，我将对代码进行审查，并提出改进意见：

1. 版本更新：

• 版本号从6.5.30.1更新到6.5.31.1，这是一个小幅版本更新
• changelog中提到修复了"SDynamicLayerUnitData中命令计数的序列化问题"
• 这个修改在多个架构的配置文件中保持一致，是合理的

2. 代码修改：
   在src/drawshape/sitemdata.h中，有一处关键修改：

out << layUnit.commands.count();

被修改为：

out << static_cast<int>(layUnit.commands.count());

改进意见：

1. 类型安全性改进：

• 原代码直接使用count()的返回值进行序列化，而count()返回的是size_type（通常是size_t或无符号类型）
• 修改后显式转换为int类型，确保了序列化数据类型的统一性
• 这是一个良好的改进，可以避免潜在的序列化数据类型不一致问题

2. 潜在问题：

• 需要确认commands的最大数量是否在int的表示范围内
• 如果commands可能超过INT_MAX，应该考虑使用更大的类型（如qint64）
• 建议添加范围检查以确保数据安全性

3. 代码风格：

• 修改后的代码风格良好，使用了显式类型转换，提高了代码可读性
• 建议在注释中说明为什么需要进行这个类型转换

4. 性能考虑：

• 这个改动对性能影响微乎其微，主要是类型转换的开销
• 序列化操作本身是I/O密集型操作，类型转换的影响可以忽略不计

5. 兼容性：

• 需要确保反序列化端也能正确处理int类型
• 如果反序列化端期望的是size_t，可能需要相应调整

总体评价：
这是一个合理的修复，解决了潜在的序列化类型不匹配问题。建议在后续代码中：

1. 添加适当的注释说明类型转换的原因
2. 考虑添加范围检查以确保数据安全性
3. 确保整个序列化/反序列化流程中类型的一致性

[deepin-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Kakueeen, lzwind

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• debian/deepin/OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[Kakueeen]

/forcemerge