Skip to content

Conversation

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Synchronize source files from linuxdeepin/qt5integration.

Source-pull-request: linuxdeepin/qt5integration#298

Synchronize source files from linuxdeepin/qt5integration.

Source-pull-request: linuxdeepin/qt5integration#298
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor Author

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: deepin-ci-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor Author

deepin pr auto review

我来对这个 CMakeLists.txt 的修改进行审查:

  1. 代码逻辑改进:
  • 添加了 DTK5 选项来控制构建 DTK5 还是 DTK6,这是一个很好的改进,增加了灵活性
  • 版本控制更加清晰,通过 DTK_VERSION_MAJOR、DTK_VERSION_MINOR、DTK_VERSION_PATCH 分别管理版本号
  • 移除了之前直接从 VERSION 文件读取版本的方式,改用 PROJECT_VERSION,更符合 CMake 标准实践
  1. 代码质量改进:
  • 变量命名更加规范,如 VERSION_SUFFIX 改为更具描述性的 DTK_NAME_SUFFIX
  • 添加了 enable_testing(),这是之前缺失的重要功能
  • 条件编译控制更加清晰,比如 Address Sanitizer 只在 Debug 模式下启用
  1. 代码性能改进:
  • 没有明显的性能改进,但通过更合理的条件编译可以避免不必要的编译选项
  1. 代码安全改进:
  • Address Sanitizer 的使用更加合理,只在 Debug 模式下启用,避免了 Release 版本的性能开销
  • 移除了直接链接 asan 库的做法,改用编译器选项,这是更安全的做法

建议改进:

  1. 可以考虑在 DTK5 选项的描述中添加更多说明,比如默认值的选择原因
  2. 建议在设置 DTK_VERSION 时添加版本验证,确保版本号的合法性
  3. 可以考虑添加一个函数来统一管理 DTK 相关的变量设置,提高代码复用性
  4. 对于 Qt 版本的检查,可以考虑使用更明确的版本比较方式,如 VERSION_GREATER_EQUAL

总体来说,这个修改提高了代码的可维护性和灵活性,是一个积极的改进。

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 6, 2026

  • 敏感词检查失败, 检测到1个文件存在敏感词
详情
{
    "CMakeLists.txt": [
        {
            "line": "  HOMEPAGE_URL \"https://github.com/linuxdeepin/qt5integration\"",
            "line_number": 14,
            "rule": "S35",
            "reason": "Url link | cc21178aa0"
        }
    ]
}

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants