Skip to content

Axom Release 0.13.0#1793

Merged
BradWhitlock merged 1010 commits intomainfrom
v0.13.0-rc
Feb 5, 2026
Merged

Axom Release 0.13.0#1793
BradWhitlock merged 1010 commits intomainfrom
v0.13.0-rc

Conversation

@BradWhitlock
Copy link
Member

This PR makes Axom Release 0.13.0 from the content of the develop branch on 2/5/2026.

gunney1 and others added 30 commits January 8, 2026 00:16
TetMeshClipper depends on bump to compute the tet mesh boundary.
Cleans up the sidre mcarray example a bit.
Internal refactoring: Use a unique_ptr internally within the MFEMReader.
Also adds a unit test for this.
This makes it easy to have SLIC_ASSERT and SLIC_ERROR throw an exception
instead of aborting and can be especially helpful when testing
that assertions/errors happen as expected.
Attributes in file are often not contiguous, so we cannot write them
to the array position of their index. Instead, we'll add them in order
and return a corresponding array of original attributes when desired.
bmhan12 and others added 16 commits January 30, 2026 07:51
Update to RAJA v2025.12.1, caliper 2.14.0
sidre::View's State enum removed the "SCALAR" type in favor of "TUPLE"
and VisIt does not yet recognize these files. This commit adds a shim
to output SCALAR for TUPLE types.
This will output "SCALAR" instead of "TUPLE" for tuple views in support
of downstream readers of sidre files, like VisIt.
We expect to phase this option out over time as application adopt
the tuple type.
The functionality was moved into the hpp file a long time ago
when templates were added to the class, but this file was not deleted.
Based on reviewer feedback, this seems like the safest strategy until there is better adoption of the TUPLE construct
Bugfix for regressions when loading sidre files in VisIt
Copy link
Member

@rhornung67 rhornung67 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@BradWhitlock this content should be merged into the main branch for the release and tag.

@BradWhitlock BradWhitlock changed the base branch from develop to main February 5, 2026 21:28
Copy link
Contributor

@gunney1 gunney1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @BradWhitlock

@BradWhitlock BradWhitlock merged commit d00f6c6 into main Feb 5, 2026
15 checks passed
@BradWhitlock BradWhitlock deleted the v0.13.0-rc branch February 5, 2026 23:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants