MNT: Add footnote to collective effects section.#30
Open
HenriqueWS11 wants to merge 5 commits intomasterfrom
Open
MNT: Add footnote to collective effects section.#30HenriqueWS11 wants to merge 5 commits intomasterfrom
HenriqueWS11 wants to merge 5 commits intomasterfrom
Conversation
HenriqueWS11
requested review from
Gabrielrezende-asc,
JeffersonBarrosVieira,
SergioLordano,
VitorSouzaLNLS,
fernandohds564,
otavio-silveira,
vellosok75 and
xresende
VitorSouzaLNLS
approved these changes
Feb 9, 2026
fernandohds564
approved these changes
Feb 9, 2026
HenriqueWS11
changed the title
xresende
approved these changes
Feb 12, 2026
vellosok75
approved these changes
Feb 20, 2026
otavio-silveira
approved these changes
Feb 24, 2026
VitorSouzaLNLS
approved these changes
Mar 31, 2026
JeffersonBarrosVieira
approved these changes
Apr 1, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
7 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There is a possibly misleading statement that the Touschek-effect is "generally significant only at low energies -- below 1 GeV or so.". I added a footnote ("Known not to be true anymore, as it remains highly relevant for modern high-energy, low-emittance electron storage rings.") to clarify this outdated information.
Please comment if you think it should be written in a better way (sugestions are very welcome!).