python313: fix build on Tiger and Leopard

[glebm]

Description

This adds the 2 patches from @kencu, originally posted in https://trac.macports.org/ticket/71206#comment:13, to fix the build on Tiger.

To fix the build on Leopard, we simply add -D_DARWIN_USE_64_BIT_INODE.

Tiger does not have 64-bit inode support. Disabling the assert completely is not ideal but for now is better than not being able to build it at all. Looking at the code, the relevant function (vstatfs) should still work regardless.

/cc @barracuda156

Type(s)

• bugfix
• enhancement
• security fix

Tested on

macOS x.y
Xcode x.y / Command Line Tools x.y.z

Verification

Have you

• followed our Commit Message Guidelines?
• squashed and minimized your commits?
• checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same change?
• referenced existing tickets on Trac with full URL in commit message?
• checked your Portfile with port lint?
• tried existing tests with sudo port test?
• tried a full install with sudo port -vst install?
• tested basic functionality of all binary files?
• checked that the Portfile's most important variants haven't been broken?

[macportsbot]

Notifying maintainers:
@jmroot for port python313.

[barracuda156]

@glebm As far as I can tell, neither -D_DARWIN_USE_64_BIT_INODE nor my earlier patch to address the same issue are needed on either 10.6.8 ppc or 10.5.8 ppc64. I have just verified building 3.13.3 on both systems without either.

I cannot check on 10.5.8 ppc, but given that 10a190 needed a patch, it is likely that 32-bit 10.5.8 needs it as well.
If this is correct, then the condition should include < 10 and only 32-bit.

[glebm]

@barracuda156 -D_DARWIN_USE_64_BIT_INODE has been reported to fix the build on 32-bit 10.5 here: https://trac.macports.org/ticket/71206#comment:25.

According to this table https://trac.macports.org/ticket/71206#comment:12, it's a no-op on 10.6 and 64-bit 10.5 (defined by default), so I think there is no harm in including it? I can tighten up the condition if we really want to but opted to keep the Portfile simple for now.

[barracuda156]

@glebm I did not investigate effects of adding that flag. If it does nothing where unneeded, then no harm using it indeed.