refactor: Rename optimize() -> try_optimize_tx_size()

[snawaz]

The current name optimize() is too generic and doesn’t convey what exactly to optimize for: space or performance?.

Initially, I assumed it was meant for performance optimization, but after reading through the relevant code, especially optimize_strategy(), I realized the optimization is actually about reducing transaction size.

Changes:

• Renamed optimize() → try_optimize_tx_size()
• Renamed optimize_strategy() → try_optimize_tx_size_if_needed()

I think this makes the purpose explicit and avoids ambiguity. The function focuses on minimizing transaction size (not any size in general), not improving speed or compute efficiency.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch snawaz/rename-optimize

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[snawaz]

Warning

This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
Learn more

• feat: Make TaskStrategy more granular #618
• refactor: Rename optimize() -> try_optimize_tx_size() #617 👈 (View in Graphite)
• feat: Execute CommitDiff as BufferTask #616
• feat: Add support for CommitDiff to efficiently commit small changes in large delegated accounts #575
• master

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

[taco-paco]

I don't mind the change to highlight what we exactly optimizing, but few points:

1. This should be opened into master, as it does not necessarily refer to commit-diff-buffer branch. Also this way commit-diff-buffer branch will be less noisy in diff with master
2. I'd prefer name optimize_tx_size, since in theory we iteratively optimizing it and not doing it right away, at least in context of TaskStrategist

[snawaz]

2. I'd prefer name optimize_tx_size, since in theory we iteratively optimizing it and not doing it right away, at least in context of TaskStrategist

Yes, that's a great name as well. We can keep that instead.

Or maybe try_optimize_tx_size() as it returns Result?

1. This should be opened into master, as it does not necessarily refer to commit-diff-buffer branch. Also this way commit-diff-buffer branch will be less noisy in diff with master

Yes. It should have been onto master if done independently. Actually, I wanted to reorder, and put this earlier in the stack so that later PRs can use the change.

And no, it wont be noisy. This PR wont merge to commit-diff-buffer. I use Graphite to manage my stack of PRs. So this PR will be merge to master directly.

[taco-paco]

I think suggestion to rename to try_optimize_* makes the most sense.