Conversation
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
This is a very strong submission, and you've done an excellent job implementing the server logic. However, one small change is needed before this can be approved.
The server currently responds with a statusText of Bad Request for 400 errors. According to the task requirements, this should be Bad request with a lowercase 'r'. This is a crucial detail as automated tests often check for an exact match.
You can fix this in src/createServer.js by changing the status message assignment for error responses. Once that's updated, your solution will be perfect!
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Important
Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button2 in the Reviewers tab.
Tip
If you have any comments about this review, please leave a message in the Add a comment section below and mention me with the @mateacademy-ai-mentor tag3.
I will read your message during my next review of your pull request. Please do not reply directly to my comments, as that feature is not supported yet.
Caution
Do not close the pull request until the review is complete. Closing it early can lead to unexpected behavior and disrupt the review process.
Footnotes
src/createServer.js
Outdated
|
|
||
| if (errors.length > 0) { | ||
| res.statusCode = 400; | ||
| res.statusMessage = 'Bad Request'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
According to the task description, the status message for a bad request should be Bad request, with a lowercase 'r'. While this might seem like a small detail, automated tests often check for exact string matches.
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Excellent work on this submission! I am approving your solution as it now meets all the requirements perfectly. You've successfully addressed the feedback from the previous review by correcting the statusText for 400 error responses. The code is clean, well-structured, and correctly handles all specified success and error cases. Great job!
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Footnotes
2 participants
No description provided.