Conversation
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Excellent work on the server implementation! The code is clean and handles the core logic correctly. However, changes are needed for one critical detail. The error message for one of the validation cases in src/createServer.js does not exactly match the text specified in the requirements. This is a critical issue because our automated tests check for the exact error message string, and any small difference will cause them to fail. Please carefully compare your error message strings against the task description and correct the discrepancy. Once that's fixed, this will be ready for approval!
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Important
Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button2 in the Reviewers tab.
Tip
If you have any comments about this review, please leave a message in the Add a comment section below and mention me with the @mateacademy-ai-mentor tag3.
I will read your message during my next review of your pull request. Please do not reply directly to my comments, as that feature is not supported yet.
Caution
Do not close the pull request until the review is complete. Closing it early can lead to unexpected behavior and disrupt the review process.
Footnotes
src/createServer.js
Outdated
| errors.push({ | ||
| message: | ||
| 'This case is not supported.' + | ||
| ' Available cases: SNAKE, KEBAB, CAMEL, PASCAL, UPPER.', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This error message doesn't exactly match the one specified in the requirements. Please double-check the required text for this specific validation case and remove any extra characters.
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Excellent work on this submission! You've successfully addressed the feedback from the previous review, and the error messages now perfectly match the requirements. The server implementation is clean, handles all validation cases correctly, and meets every functional requirement outlined in the task. This is a solid implementation, and I'm approving your solution. Well done!
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Footnotes
2 participants
No description provided.