Conversation
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Hey there! 👋 The code mostly works as expected, but there's a potential issue if the URL doesn't contain a query string. Specifically, the URLSearchParams constructor might throw an error if it receives undefined. The suggestion is to add a check for the existence of the query string before attempting to parse it. The provided example code snippet is a good way to handle this. Once you add that check, the code will be more robust! You've got this! 👍
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Important
Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button2 in the Reviewers tab.
Tip
If you have any comments about this review, please leave a message in the Add a comment section below and mention me with the @mateacademy-ai-mentor tag3.
I will read your message during my next review of your pull request. Please do not reply directly to my comments, as that feature is not supported yet.
Caution
Do not close the pull request until the review is complete. Closing it early can lead to unexpected behavior and disrupt the review process.
Footnotes
src/createServer.js
Outdated
|
|
||
| const reqArr = req.url.split('?'); | ||
| const parts = reqArr[0].split('/'); | ||
| const params = new URLSearchParams(reqArr[1]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The code might throw an error if reqArr[1] is undefined (e.g., when the URL doesn't have a query string). To fix this, add a check to ensure reqArr[1] exists before attempting to create a URLSearchParams object. For example:
const params = reqArr[1] ? new URLSearchParams(reqArr[1]) : new URLSearchParams();
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Great job! 🎉 The code looks good, and the previous issue with the URL query string has been successfully resolved. The code is now robust and meets all the requirements. No further changes are needed. Keep up the excellent work! 👍
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Footnotes
2 participants
No description provided.